Tehum Care Services Inc. Bankruptcy Exit: A New Legal Strategy for Tort Claims

A courtroom scene representing the innovative bankruptcy proceedings of Tehum Care Services Inc.

SPACE AVAILABLE FOR SPONSORS!

Want to target the right audience? Sponsor our site and choose your specific industry to connect with a relevant audience.

What Sponsors Receive:

Prominent brand mentions across targeted, industry-focused articles
High-visibility placements that speak directly to an engaged local audience
Guaranteed coverage that maximizes exposure and reinforces your brand presence

Interested in seeing what sponsored content looks like on our platform?

Browse Examples of Sponsored News and Articles:

May’s Roofing & Contracting
Forwal Construction
NSC Clips
Real Internet Sales
Suited
Florida4Golf

Click the button below to sponsor our articles:

Sponsor Our Articles

News Summary

Tehum Care Services Inc., a prison healthcare company, legally emerges from bankruptcy with an innovative settlement plan for tort claimants. They established a $75 million fund with options for claimants to pursue larger state court payouts, amidst a unique approach that retains rights for further claims against parent companies. Legal experts express skepticism about its replicability, raising questions about consent from creditors. This case could set important precedents for future mass tort litigations in bankruptcy.

Tehum Care Services Inc. Exits Bankruptcy with Innovative Settlement for Tort Claimants

In a significant legal development, Tehum Care Services Inc., a prison health-care company, has received court approval to emerge from bankruptcy. This decision comes on the heels of an innovative settlement plan that offers a unique approach to settling personal injury claims tied to the company’s service in prisons. The approval of this plan signals a shift in how companies deal with mass tort liabilities during bankruptcy proceedings.

Settlement Plan and Claimant Options

As part of its reorganization, Tehum has agreed to a $75 million settlement fund, allowing claimants, particularly those incarcerated, to opt out of this offer. This gives claimants the opportunity to pursue potentially larger payouts in state courts for allegations of inadequate medical care while in prison. Interestingly, most of the tort claimants did not choose to opt out but accepted the settlement proposed by Tehum.

The Unique Approach of Tehum

Unlike the traditional “Texas Two-Step” bankruptcy strategy, which typically serves to shield parent companies from liabilities, Tehum’s method stands out. The plan involved precise allocations for over 200 tort claims, establishing a tiered matrix of payouts ranging from $1.2 million to $1.6 million for wrongful death claims. A total of $25 million is to be distributed among creditors as part of the settlement, underlining the company’s commitment to resolving claims in a manner that is both unique and legally innovative.

Rights to Pursue Further Claims

Moreover, the settlement allows certain claimants to retain their rights to litigate against Tehum’s parent companies, Corizon Health Inc. and YesCare Corp. This provision is a crucial aspect of the plan, as it signifies that claimants do not forfeit their legal rights entirely in exchange for compensation. For instance, David Hall, classified as a Tier Two claimant, anticipates receiving approximately $385,000 for a severe injury sustained in a Maryland prison—a compelling example of how this plan is being received by some individuals.

Concerns from Legal Experts

Justice Department’s bankruptcy watchdog has expressed concerns regarding liability releases that may have occurred without proper consent from all creditors involved, questioning the legitimacy of certain aspects of the plan.

Precedent for Future Bankruptcy Cases

The approval of Tehum’s bankruptcy proceedings may set a noteworthy precedent for future cases, particularly regarding how objecting claimants may have the ability to opt out and pursue state law damages that are uncapped. This development could alter the landscape of mass tort liability in bankruptcy situations, creating new avenues for claimants seeking justice.

Conclusion

As Tehum Care Services Inc. prepares to move forward following its bankruptcy exit, the case presents a remarkable intersection of legal strategy and personal injury claims. With an innovative approach that prioritizes claimant options, this situation could influence similar scenarios in the future. However, the inherent skepticism regarding replication across larger companies will remain a pivotal consideration for observers and participants in the legal sector.