South Carolina Education Partnership with PragerU Sparks Debate

Name: HERE CHARLESTON
Price range: $$

Students exploring a variety of educational resources in a South Carolina classroom.

News Summary

A recent collaboration between the South Carolina Department of Education and conservative media organization PragerU has ignited discussions about political bias in educational resources. The partnership, announced in September 2023, provides educators with a 67-page document linking state standards to PragerU materials. Supporters praise the initiative for promoting family-friendly content, while critics express concerns over potential political bias and inaccuracies in the resources. The Charleston County School District is reviewing the situation, with opposing views about this new supplemental content intensifying the debate on educational practices in publicly funded schools.

Columbia, South Carolina: A New Chapter in Education Sparks Debate

In a surprising turn of events, the South Carolina Department of Education has forged a partnership with PragerU, a well-known conservative media organization, which has ignited a heated discussion within the education community. Announced in September 2023, this collaboration has officially progressed as of December, with PragerU Standards Aligned Resources being made available on the state’s official education website.

What’s Included in the Partnership?

The partnership introduces a notable 67-page document dubbed “SC Standards with PragerU Content.” This resource links various educational standards set forth by South Carolina to specific materials from PragerU, providing educators with a curated list of options to enrich their teaching. While this document was published back in September, its integration into the department’s official offerings marks a significant shift in educational resources accessible to teachers statewide.

Praise from Some, Concerns from Others

Republican leaders in South Carolina have lauded this union, praising the initiative for its commitment to providing professionally produced, family-friendly content. They see PragerU as an educational resource that presents a politically balanced viewpoint, which they feel is necessary in today’s educational climate.

However, not everyone is on board. Critics have raised alarm bells over the potential political bias embedded within PragerU’s materials. Accusations include suggestions of racism, historical inaccuracies, and concerns about the encroachment of politics into the classroom. The Charleston Jewish Federation has voiced worries regarding the exclusionary focus that might inherently arise from PragerU’s content, especially concerning certain religious views.

How PragerU Resources Are Categorized

It’s important to note that the resources provided by PragerU are classified as “supplemental”. This categorization means they are not mandatory for teachers to use, and the South Carolina Department of Education will review them differently than traditional curriculum materials. In a notable move, PragerU has been characterized as a nonprofit organization focused on promoting “educational content promoting American values,” rather than functioning as an academic institution. As such, the department is undertaking an analysis to understand which PragerU resources align best with existing educational standards.

Access and Content Recommendations

At present, the standards alignment document can only be accessed through PragerU’s own website. The South Carolina Department of Education has compiled its own list of recommended resources, highlighting around 83% of PragerU’s extensive catalog, which counts over 1,200 materials. However, it’s worth noting that some materials deemed historically inaccurate have been excluded from recommendation, including specific videos that fail to meet the educational criteria set forth by the state.

The Community Takes Notice

The Charleston County School District is aware of this partnership and the materials arising from it, but as of now, they have no plans for implementation. Local education officials, responding to concerns from the legislative caucus, are seeking a review process for PragerU’s offerings, particularly aimed at materials some have labeled as “inaccurate and offensive.”

A Broader Aim or a Misstep?

PragerU frames its partnership with South Carolina as part of a larger initiative to counter perceived left-leaning ideologies in education across the country. Within families and classrooms, the debate about this partnership continues to unfold, with some educators and parents worried about the introduction of biased perspectives in widely publicly funded schools.

As the dust settles on this partnership, it’s clear that the discussions surrounding educational content, political bias, and the role of organizations like PragerU in shaping young minds will only become more pronounced. For now, South Carolina’s students and their families find themselves at the heart of a growing educational saga.