Charleston County Faces Crucial Election on Transportation Sales Tax
Charleston, SC – As we cozy up to November, Charleston County residents are gearing up for a significant vote that could reshape our roads and communities for the next quarter-century. The local election this year presents a pivotal decision on whether to approve a half-percent transportation sales tax—often referred to as a “half-cent” sales tax. This tax is estimated to generate over $5 billion within a 25-year span, funding road improvements and transportation projects throughout the county.
The Big Picture: Why This Matters
In a nutshell, setting our sights on the proposed extension of Interstate 526 (I-526) is at the center of this election. The plan is to connect the end of I-526 at West Ashley—where it currently meets US Highway 17—to the proposed Mark Clark Extension across Johns Island, ultimately reaching James Island. Sounds straightforward, right? Well, it’s a bit more complicated.
The project carries a hefty price tag of $2.3 billion, along with another $648 million in borrowing costs tied to other projects that voters will be asked about in the same package. This means that around half of the expected revenue from the proposed sales tax would fund this extension, leaving little for other important transportation needs.
Community Concerns: A Divided Opinion
Many residents are raising red flags about this proposal. The construction of this extension could lead to significant development on Johns Island, an area that many residents are keen to keep as rural as possible. While some development might occur anyway, there’s a real concern that the highway could hasten the pace of change on the island, forever altering its character.
In fact, when compared to other areas, Johns Island has a surprising amount of future planning ahead. For example, while Hilton Head Island boasts a larger population, its new bridge is set for three lanes in each direction. In contrast, Johns Island will potentially have four lanes both ways, even without the I-526 extension. And let’s not forget, the total cost for I-526 is likely to increase—just like we’ve seen with other road projects plagued by rising prices.
Alternative Transportation Priorities at Risk
What’s a bit disheartening to many is that although the County Council had a laundry list of much-needed transportation projects, this sales tax proposal ties the funding to I-526 as the only priority. This decision leaves other pressing projects—including upgrading the flood-prone ramp from US Highway 17 to S.C. Highway 61—an afterthought. These smaller, community-focused projects are highly valued yet remain in limbo because I-526 would consume such a significant portion of the funds.
Historically, Charleston County has struggled with larger projects. For instance, attempts to complete smaller jobs from previous sales tax referenda have fallen behind due to various complex challenges. Residents worry that if the County Council can’t tackle what seems to be more manageable tasks, they might be ill-equipped to handle an enormous project like I-526.
The Environmental Aspect: What’s Being Left Out?
And let’s consider the environmental implications. Although the county earmarked $432 million for park and conservation efforts, that’s just 8% of the overall budget. For comparison, in 2004, 17% of the budget went to greenbelt projects, and back in 2016, it was still around 10%. It appears that environmental and park projects are taking a backseat to big highway expansions.
A Clear Message: What Should Voters Do?
If this proposal doesn’t pass, some County Council members plan to reintroduce it again in 2026. But for now, residents have the chance to send a strong message against it—not just for themselves, but for the sake of future priorities and the character of our beloved community.
So, Charleston, when you head to the polls, think about what roads and communities you want for the next generation and beyond. Your vote could make a lasting impact.
