Union Dockworkers Launch a Strike from Maine to Texas over Pay and Automation
Charleston, October 1, 2024
In what marks the first significant strike in almost half a century, some 45,000 members of the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) launched a strike action on Tuesday. This decision shuts down approximately 36 major seaports along the East Coast, reaching from Maine to Texas and including Charleston city. Union members proceeded to set up picket lines at three separate shipping terminals under the jurisdiction of the South Carolina State Ports Authority just after midnight, according to Charles Brave, the president of the Local 1422 chapter of the ILA.
This strike breaks a 50-year lull since the last significant strike action in 1977, which lasted over six weeks. It culminated in agreements for pay raises, a marked increase in pension contributions, and new provisions to address the looming question of automation at the time.
It is noteworthy that Eastern ports handle approximately half of the year-on-year cargo trade in the United States. Meanwhile, their West Coast counterparts, serviced by a separate progeny of longshoremen belonging to a different union, continue to operate under a new contract agreement reached just last year, which also included pay hikes.
The underpinning reasons behind the current strike include a host of demands, led by wage hikes of an additional $5 per hour annually for six years, representing a 77% pay increase over the length of the proposed contract, as reported by the New York Times. Furthermore, the Union is staunchly opposed to the adoption of automated cranes and other container-handling equipment that require fewer workers to operate. These demands remain uncompromised, culminating in the failure of talks with the US Maritime Alliance, dubbed USMX, a body that represents major shipping lines, back in June.
Automation over Wages
In a statement released Monday morning, the Union underlined that “ILA longshore workers deserve to be compensated for the important work they do in keeping American commerce moving and growing.” President of ILA Local 1422, Charles Brave, indicated in an interview with the SC Daily Gazette that the automation of processes was of more significant concern to his members in South Carolina in comparison to the wage issue, underscoring the economic repercussions that potential job losses would have on local economies.
Beyond Moving Cargo
During the currency of the strike, the Union leaves a window open to work cargo ships ferrying military materials, perishable goods, and cruise ships, according to Brave. Beyond these exemptions, he staunchly proclaimed, there is “nothing moving on the port.” The broader implications of the strike seem inevitable, and numerous stakeholders have expressed concerns over its potential economic impact.
Presidential Election and The Strike’s Potential Impact
With the countdown to the upcoming November 5 presidential election continuing apace, Democrats are using union workers to deliver voters, primarily in battleground states along the East Coast, including Georgia, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. Analysts predict the cost of the strike to the US economy to vary from $540 million per day, a figure suggested by The Conference Board, a global think tank, to a larger estimate of $5 billion daily, as predicted by JPMorgan analysts and reported by the New York Times.
Response from the Federal Government and Other Stakeholders
The US Chamber of Commerce and National Retail Federation have called upon President Joe Biden to step in and use his emergency powers under the Taft-Hartley Act. This could potentially lead to a court injunction, forcing longshoremen back to work for an 80-day cooling-off period. The White House, however, has urged both parties to return to the negotiating table but, so far, indicated it would not directly intervene.
Conclusion
While the ongoing dispute has yet to be resolved, the state port has extended its opening hours in recent weeks in anticipation of potential disruptions. Retailers have proactively increased their inventories to prepare for the strike action amidst the backdrop of the lingering COVID-19 pandemic, which has previously resulted in slow roll-outs and an increase in shipping costs contributing to higher inflation. Nonetheless, the federal government has endeavored to install better monitoring processes for supplies and inventories. As the situation continues to unfold, there are looming concerns about the potential impact on the economy, supply chains, and the forthcoming presidential elections.
